The perils of ignorant dependance

No comments:

So I came down with a cold on Wednesday, and was re-reading Lord of the Rings and came across a wonderful quote. It's from Gandalf, of course.

"Perilous to all of us are the devices of an art deeper than we ourselves possess."

This is spoken to Pippin after Gandalf realizes that Saruman has been perverted by his use of the palantír, a device made in the depths of time and no longer completely understood. It is, of course, a cautionary tale, and taken with a grain of salt I think there is great wisdom in it that can be applied to technology, but especially to computers. It is no coincidence that the palantír is essentially an communications device, like the modern day computer. I was pleased to run across this mailing list post by Kragen Sitaker that goes into some depth of explanation.

There are several lessons, actually. First, do not get frustrated with people, especially older ones, who stubbornly refuse to use certain kinds of technology. It may be stubbornness, but it may also be an intuitive understanding that nothing comes without it's cost.

Second, it brings to light how much of our lives are governed by "devices of an art deeper than we ourselves possess". Kragen uses the examples of software and cars, but certainly there are many other engineering feats that fall within this exegesis. I don't really know what it takes to build a road, for example, or a house, or how to weave or farm or do any of the many things it takes to keep me alive.

There is obviously something to be said here, but it's not clear if it's already been said. Certainly it is troubling to be so far removed from the activities that actually support my life. But the only peril that could really harm me is outright global catastrophe, I think. Our society is extremely skilled in understanding information, and if given sufficient incentive, recreate processes at virtually any level of the technological scale.

There are other perils, of course, of the "enemy of the state" variety - where one's "identity" is maliciously perverted or removed.

It is strange, our world. Life is so very easy with money; food is so cheap as to be free, even basic shelter (at least in most parts) may as well also be free. But with *no* money, it would be very hard to live. One cannot pick one's own food in the city. Certainly it would be difficult, if not impossible, to build one's own computer from raw materials. That in itself makes the computer perilous, I suppose.

In a sense, the entire society in which I live is a 'deeper art than I possess', because I don't really understand how it all fits together and why it doesn't all just fall apart. To use a physical analogy, why is society apparently stable, like an airplane, rather than unstable like a helicopter? Why does it all-of-a-sudden become unstable and convulse into revolution and war?

With respect to software, one thing is for certain: if you take Gandalf seriously, all computer users should understand computers to a far greater degree than they currently do. Since we all use computers now (in one form or another) that means we all should really understand them. Furthermore, we can minimize our peril by using thick client open source software. That way we can, if we have the skill and the desire, peek into the black box and see how the gears turn. Closed source software isn't so easy to peak into, but it is at least possible. Thin-client applications like Google are the most opaque; as a rule, one only sees the interface and has no chance to see how things work behind the scenes. Practically speaking, it makes no difference to the public-at-large, since the source code of Firefox is just as inaccessible as the algorithms of Google. Well, I think it makes a difference, and surely that counts for something?

A Road Trip I'd like to Take

No comments:

As part of the publicity for Ferrari's new Maranello (the 599 GTB), they went on a little road trip.

I think I would like to do that, too, someday. I haven't done it already out of fear - the tales of corruption are hard to ignore, and I don't know how long I would last. Alone is vulnerable. Nowadays being American is vulnerable, too (thanks George!). Traveling with a pack of 50 journalists and with corporate sponsorship would make the journey a bit less risky.


Protecting our future with frozen seeds

No comments:
This story appeals to my Science-Fiction sensibilities: Norway is paying $5m to squirrel away 1.5 million varieties of food crops in a remote, frozen, and elevated (to guard against the rising sea levels of global warming) seed vault, just in case biodiversity takes a plunge.

This project reminds me of the Australian thing where information is being etched on silicon blocks (I can't remember the name of the project), and the North American project to store nuclear waste safely for tens of thousands of years.

Stranger than fiction

No comments:
Astronaut faces attempted murder charges

I'm not normally a fan of this kind of story. But the irony here is just delicious: astronauts are the closest thing we have in our society to aristocracy. And for the most part, they stay out of the news. Of course, the higher they all, the harder they fall.

The right wing is going to shake their collective head and let that nagging doubt about women in the workplace speak a little more loudly. That's too bad because men are just as likely to act like idiots when they're in love.

This is definitely movie-fodder. Charlize Theron as Lisa Nowak?

Penny Arcade takes on Vista

No comments:
Penny Arcade! - The Manifold Faces of Vista

ROFLMAO

Starting the Fantasy Fire

No comments:
James Nicoll has an interesting comment on fantasy and science-fiction.

Why is it that fantasy works (the successful ones anyway) tend to be much longer than the sf works? Of course I am aware of several exceptions to this generalization, not the least of which would be The Foundation Series and The Dune Series. But when you count the sheer number of Robert Jordan's in the world, you realize that there really is a difference.

The key difference is that fantasy readers want to stay in that world and the sf readers want to apply what they've learned to the real world. I think this offers insight into two related entertainments, tabletop RPGs (like D&D) and MMORPGs (like World of Warcraft), and to a certain extent all manner of fanfic and even criticism.

A fantasy book is like a chemical handwarmer - it reliably starts, warms you for a bit, and then falls cold and dead. People like the longer books because that translates to more hand-warmth, and it allows them to forestall the inevitable. Table top RPG is a bunch of friends getting together to light a fire. If started, such a flame is hotter than the hand-warmer and is generally better (by all accounts). Sometimes the wood is too soggy to light, but there's a certain pride in even making the attempt. The successful MMORPG is The Sun.

Does opening a Harry Potter hotline constitute a spoiler?

No comments:
harry potter: Hotline Opens to Counsel Heartbroken Potter Fans

My prediction:
1 - Dumbledore isn't dead (he's only mostly dead)
2 - Snape isn't really evil
3 - Harry Dies.
4 - Voldemort Dies.

It's kind of like the end of Lord of the Rings - sure, the One Ring is destroyed, and the armies of Mordor are dispersed by the Aaragorn and his buddies. But, the other rings' power is also destroyed, and while Barad-Dur crumbles, so does the foundation of Lothlorien and Rivendell. The message is quite simple: that there can be no destruction of evil without some destruction of good. The calculas of epic-fantasy resolution is almost always bitter sweet like that.

But you know what, whatever happens props to Rowling for writing a consistently rousing tale that really only gets better which each passing book. Even bigger props for not drawing the tale out into some interminable garbage a la Robert Jordan (who's 24th brick of a book was just released).

Oh yeah, in other fantasy entertainment news, I got Earthsea from Netflix. Pretty darn bad! With a cast like that, and some really amazing prior success (the Dune and Children of Dune miniseries are astoundingly good) I had high hopes despite the warnings. Ged's blacksmith father has got to earn some sort of award for Worst Acting Ever. Kristin Kruek is quite easy on the eyes and does a decent acting job. I really wanted to see more action on Roke. Oh well, at least I didn't have to watch commercials. :)

sound advice from a sci fi master

No comments:
Robert A. Heinlein: "“Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.”

The new Blogger

No comments:
Eric Case talksabout the new Blogger, who's most important feature is the addition of categories.

However, I'm deeply concerned that without static publishing it will be more difficult to get data off the site.

Firefox supports animated gif "favicons"

No comments:
If you browse to this image:erik-rock.gif (GIF Image, 48x48 pixels) Firefox will use it as your "favicon", including animation. Wow, it sure is annoying!

O'Reilly and Colbert talk the talk

No comments:
It's hard to believe, but O'Reilly appeared on the Colbert Report. (And Colbert was on the O'Reilly factor). Bill had nothing to gain from this; why did he do it? Unfortunately it wasn't nearly as funny as it could have been. And frankly, the bit when Colbert microwaved the DVD recording of the entire thing at the end of his show disturbed me. Colbert is successful precisely because he is not mean spirited, and in many ways really does pay homage to O'Reilly. Being hateful just ruins the whole thing.

How does Colbert pay homage? He uses some of the tropes of the O'Reilly factor that make it so watchable. These things generally give it the air of snappiness, decisiveness, and clarity. The show is incredibly well organized, and into "bite sized" pieces. Colbert is never doubtful, always decisive. His presentation is polished and neat. He certainly has a charismatic flare. This last is even more potent in Colbert because his goal is to amuse not to outrage. Colbert emulates one of the greatest qualities people demand in a relationship: predictability. He has clearly stated his outlook, he is internally consistent, and even if you disagree he's still easy to deal with.

Superior organization and personal confidence has been the hallmark of recent Republican success. John Kerry ran a terrible campaign, and he really was quite flimsy in his views. I have read that the Bush White House reports to work every day in shirt and tie at 7am, and is exceedingly well organized. I bet The O'Reilly Factor (and the Colbert Report) are run in similar fashion.

One could hope that these genuinely positive qualities of Bush and O'Reilly could be emulated by *everyone*, regardless of their specific political stance. I have considerable sympathy for the left-wing (or rather, antipathy for many of the things Bush has done) but by golly it's true - the left consistently comes across as less put together, less organized, and with a fuzzier message.

O'Reilly wants "traditional values". That's easy to understand, at least. What does Al Franken want? It's much harder to define. Primarily because liberals these days are largely protesting the changes that conservatives are trying to make. (Which is odd considering that "conservative" usually implies not changing things). Unfortunately, people with agendas are more entertaining. The only really entertaining way to thwart that agenda is the way Colbert is doing it. God bless his French-Canadian heart.

O'Reilly and Colbert talk the talk - USATODAY.com

Nintendo Wii Dissassembled

No comments:
I very much want one to connect to the projector, but stores still can't keep them in stock and I find myself balking at the $100 premium craigslisters are charging. To satisfy my craving, I found this excellent photo essay: Cracking open the Nintendo Wii. That and it's sister article (documenting the assembled Wii in great detail) are quite enjoyable.

'The Diamond Age' - a miniseries!

No comments:
George Clooney is going to produce The Diamond Age for the Sci Fi channel. Neil Stephenson (the books original author) will adapt for the small screen.

This is exciting for several reasons. First, it's good to know that some Hollywood stars (Clooney) have good taste in story telling. Second, The Diamond Age is hard-SF at it's finest, and anything that increases it's exposure is a great thing. Third, the story has a lot of wonderful ideas in it that deserve wider exposure.

Read the story. at zap2it.com.

Fun Ajax programs (Lemmings!)

No comments:
I'm learning a bit about Ajax (via the excellent "Ajax Design Patterns") and have found a few really fun sites through my studies. Here are two sites that demonstrate drag-n-drop and sprites:



The latter is particularly impressive and fun.

An an unusual assasination attempt

No comments:
In a recent article about Hamas softening it's stance on Israel it was revealed: "...Israel tried to assassinate [Hamas leader Mr Meshaal] in 1997 by injecting poison into his ear..."

Hmm? Why would you inject poison into somebody's ear? Wouldn't a nice vein, or even a flabby area of fat do nicely?

Or perhaps Mossad tried to drive the man insane with Yoko Ono and Culture Club records?

Wag of the Finger: Newly elected democrats

No comments:
If the democrats even think about increasing troop levels, just go ahead and dissolve the Democratic party. These people were elected because of frustration with the war - to commit even further resources is sheer folly. We screwed the pooch on this one: let's leave.

We should be hearing very loud noises (of the "no way") sort from the Dems. The silence is incredibly disheartening. Wag of the finger to you!!!

Plan for troop 'surge' in Iraq gathers force | csmonitor.com

Tip of the Hat: To German town Delmenhorst

No comments:
To keep out a neo-Nazi foothold, one German town unites | csmonitor.com. Good for you, German town.

Unusual names: St.Martin in the Fields

No comments:
St.Martin in the Fields is a famous London church. It is associated with a well-known musical group The Academy of Saint Martin in the Fields, which is how I heard of the church.

I have to admit that it took me a while to figure out the noun-ness of "Saint Martin in the fields". Or, spelled more correctly: Saint Martin-in-the-fields. This leads to the question: why was the church named so oddly? Did it need to distinguish itself from other churches named "Saint Martin-riding-on-horseback" or "Saint Martin-rowing-a-boat-on-the-Thames"? Are there other churches similarly named? "Saint Paul-on-the-lake" has a nice ring to it.

One cannot help but admire the ingeniousness of such a naming scheme. Indeed, it's like a Medieval DNS! But it only has two parts, the Saint Name, and the (preposition, natural feature) pair.

It is fun to make your own using a list of Saint names, a list of prepositions, and a list of natural features (another list is here).

Some possible church names:


  • Saint Augustine-atop-the-escarpment
  • Saint Jarlath-beside-the-mesa
  • Saint Raucho-among-the-gullies


(And during my search for a good list of geographical terms like "butte" and "steppe" I ran across this wikipedia "List of Unusual Geographic Names". I hope St. Martin-in-the-fields made one of those lists.)

Movie Review: The Pursuit of Happyness (2006)

No comments:
The Pursuit of Happyness (2006) is a well intentioned but utterly boring attempt to inspire.

Will Smith plays Chris Gardner, a man on the edge of total collapse. He is out of money, has no income, his wife leaves him, and he has a small child to take care of in the harsh city lights of a (curiously muted) San Franscisco. He does have one source of income though, and Chris shown running and/or lugging around that income (a big white piece of medical equipment) for most of the movie. It is this grating, boring visual that most clearly defines this movie. The film is about Chris's struggle to complete the 6 month *unpaid* internship despite being jailed, evicted, and, worst of all, having to use public transportation, but really it's about him lugging around a big white box.

Attempting a "man vs his environment" kind of drama, the central question of the movie is: will Chris Gardener make it? His setbacks, both large and small, are documented in excruciating detail, and yet I found myself not really caring. Chris's character is likable enough, so why do I find myself not caring? First, Chris is likable but not sympathetic. Secondly, the pacing of the film is thrown way off by a misguided attempt to show off Will Smith's real-life-son's acting talent. Third, this is just banal filmmaking.

One is tempted to describe the movie's style as "understated" but in the end it just feels lazy. This is a movie that chooses to announces in voice over: "This is the part of my life I call...running." Because Will Smith's character is running. Or "This part of my life I call...internship." Because he's about to start an internship. Get it? Or perhaps this filmmaking that has another motive...

...like introducing the (passable) talent of Will Smith's real-life son, who gets more-than-his-fair-share of screen time. The son in this sort of movie should get only enough screen time to establish the attachment and relationship with his father - to underscore to the audience how much the father has to lose. But young Jaden Smith's portion goes far beyond that, to the detriment of the film. Ironically, this could also be to the detriment of young Jaden's career, as this much exposure cries out "you just got the part because of daddy!" Let the kid stand on his own two feet, Will!

Thandie Newton (who was the sexually assaulted black woman in "Crash", the conniving Necromonger wife in "Chronicles of Riddick", and Dr. Carter's African wife on "ER") was totally wasted in this film. She is gorgeous and smart, and she can act (which is rare enough these days). As such she is a precious resource, not to be wasted. She got a chance to emote a little bit in this film, but her character is so quickly dismissed by Will Smith's character that whatever sizzle she conjures just sputters and dies. That's too bad. It didn't help that her character's arc goes from "marriage on the skids; bitter; anxious about the future" to "permanently off camera".

My final problem with the film is the message (or glaring lack of an important part of the message) which makes Chris Gardner's character so unsympathetic. Likable, yes. Sympathetic, no. While I understand the kind of struggle Chris was going through, it all seemed highly preventable. The first mistake was taking such a huge risk on those medical devices. The second mistake was a profound lack of planning once sales started to drop. His wife should never have had to start working double-shifts. She was right to be angry with him for just filing extensions on the tax bill. And to place all the blame on her (as the movie does) for not "having faith" in him and sticking with him isn't exactly fair. Because, if he didn't get the internship (which he does) he still didn't have plan B. And if he didn't get the job from the internship, he also didn't have a plan B. Sure, Mr. Gardner had to learn an important lesson about believing in himself, and going after his dream, and finding work that plays to his strengths. But the movie never shows Mr. Gardner learning a third and very important lesson: don't take stupid risks. Especially when you have a family to support.

Gardner is portrayed as a victim (who weathers this abuse stoically) throughout the movie. Here are some specifics:

1. his landlord kicks him out for not paying rent.
2. his wife leaves him.
3. the IRS confiscates back taxes from his checking account, leaving him penniless.
4. the police arrest him for not paying a huge sheaf of parking tickets
5. some hippie girl steals the expensive equipment he leaves with her when he goes in for a job interview
6. a taxi driver chases after him when he ditches a fair that his prospective employer should have paid.

In every instance these problems were preventable. This movie chronicles a man heroically struggling out of a deep pit. But the movie ignores the fact that he dug his own pit. Chris failed to plan. Chris took huge financial risks and was blindsided by his eventual failure. Chris put his wife in the unenviable position of supporting him and his son. Chris got in the taxi with his future boss, and traded the risk he might have to pay the fare for additional face time with his boss (which paid off). Chris ignored the IRS until it was too late. He ignored the police until they arrested him. He trusted a hippie girl with his financial life. Chris is a man who ignores things and hopes that they will go away, and that lesson doesn't ever appear to be unlearned. If anything, it's reinforced by the message of this movie.

To really be a victim you either need a capricious universe or a villain. The only person victimizing Chris was Chris. The lack of victimhood is death to sympathy. The death of sympathy is the death of drama. Bravo on getting out of a jam, Mr. Gardner, and admiring Thomas Jefferson. But there's another founding father worth looking into, the one who said:

"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."

This would be nice to have

No comments:
Lenovo Support & downloads - ThinkPad Multi-Burner Plus Ultrabay Slim drive - Overview

Hot sauce: Blair’s 16 Million

No comments:
Blair’s 16 Million Product Review | Hot Sauce Blog: "I decided to mix one crystal into tomato soup. I took a can of standard condensed tomato soup, mixed with one can of water and brought it to a boil. The capsaicin crystal will not mix like any of the other Blair’s A.M. line, which makes perfect sense, since it’s a dry crystal and not an oil based extract. So the only way to liquify this stuff is to heat it up. So using tweezers and gloves, I picked up the tiny crystal, and into the pot of soup it goes. First bite was not that hot, so I had the wife take a bite. She threatened divorce once she could speak again."